Peer to Peer lending in Australia has been around since 2012 with SocietyOne claiming to be the first P2P platform to start trading in Australia. While they may have been the first, P2P lending didn’t become available to the retail investor until 2014 with RateSetter becoming the first platform available to everyday Australians. Since that time the industry has been growing to capture more of market share.
I was interested in the stats and growth of the industry so I started doing some research to learn how large the P2P Lending has become in Australia. Surprising the last government report I can find on the topic (and all articles I’ve read still reference this) is the ASIC Survey of marketplace lending providers: 2016–17. This report does indicate that future updates are to follow so I will be sure to keep an eye out. In the interim, I’ve collated available loans stats from P2P lenders who display their data to give an indication of the growth of the industry.
Before we get to the analysis, there were some interesting insights from the ASIC report on the Australian P2P Lending industry worth highlighting. The most commonly quoted stat is the size and growth of lending growing from $156 million in Financial Year (FY) 2015-16 to $300 million in FY 2016-17. To put these figures into perspective, I’ve pulled some Lending Finance stats from the Australian Bureau of Statistics for the corresponding years and tabulated below (all figures in millions).
As can be seen the P2P market is still quite small when compared total debt of Australian consumers and businesses.
The ASIC report listed out the average and expected default rates of P2P loans. For 2016-17 the default rate was 2.2% which was lower than ASIC has predicted at 2.9%. Projections from the P2P platforms put the 2017-18 loan default rate at 2.4%. While we wait for the latest ASIC report for the industry averages, the default rates currently quoted by RateSetter is 0.6% for 2018 and MoneySpot quote a current default rate of 3.822% in their latest monthly report. To put P2P lending default rates into perspective, the consumer default rate of big banks was between 1-3% in 2016, while the national mortgage default rate in mid-2018 was sitting at 1.58%.
The other interesting statistic in the ASIC report was the number of P2P retail investors. The results were surprisingly with numbers much lower than I would have guessed. The graph below is an extract out of the ASIC report showing the breakdown of investors.
Now we get into the challenge of trying to determine how the industry has grown. To approach this I’ve collected the available data on loan books from the P2P platforms websites and collated into comparative years. The data used below was sourced from MoneySpot (through all available individual monthly reports), RateSetter (download of loan book) and TruePillars (entering details of all loans visible on the website – missing about 20 loans based on the numbering convention). The graph below shows the growth in total loans issued over time. As can be seen RateSetter has had some significant growth over the past 18 months compared against the other platforms.
From here the loans funded were split out into individual Financial Years to match the ASIC report. This gives us an indication of the potential portion of the market at the time of the ASIC report and how it has grown. The graph below shows the cumulative loans issue per year for the three P2P platforms above.
I’ve broken the above down into the table below to show that that the industry is growing year on year at the moment. The table below is in millions of dollars.
Given the different growth rates of the P2P platforms it’s hard for me to make a projection on the potential size of the market to date so we will just have to wait for ASIC to come out with the details. However it appears evident the industry has experienced significant growth since the previous ASIC report. What will be interesting is what impact the Banking royal commission will have on the P2P lending space and if it will help drive the P2P industry by driving people away from the traditional banks to alternative financing arrangements.